Wednesday, February 12, 2014

There's No Lack Of American Political Commentary

By Jerri Perry


American political commentary is endlessly fascinating. It can also be irritating, depressing, and exhausting, depending on how much emotion the audience invests in the experience. It is informative but can also be misleading. No matter what the venue, a responsible citizen should seek to establish the truth behind what is said or written. This, of course, is easier said than done.

Today America is a country of sharp divisions. Racial tensions still flare up, conservatives passionately debate with progressives, and there are many differences on the economy, foreign policy, the role of government, and the national debt that keep heated discussions going. The branches of the federal government have trouble working together, and many private citizens think that all policy makers are ruled by money rather than by concern for the good of America.

Both conservative and liberal commentators become celebrities, and people love calling in to add to the discussion or leaving comments on blog sites. The issues are so complex that people often are undecided about which view is most worthy of their support. The underlying view of the world that each contributor holds often defines their position, which is why there are such great differences in opinion on every topic.

Understanding major legislation is not a priority for most citizens. For this reason, they may turn to high-profile commentators for explanations and guidance. This may give commentators too much influence, but most people have neither the time, experience, or inclination to follow the workings of public policy. Mainstream media outlets are not seen as objective, although many still believe what they read or see, and elections often go to the candidate who spends the most money.

Many conservatives are Christians, with a world view that dictates their politics. Unfortunately, this viewpoint might make no sense whatsoever to others. Christians look to God for guidance and provision, and are notorious all over the world for embracing personal freedom and resisting tyranny. They don't believe that government should control social issues or that government should decide moral questions.

A balanced budget amendment, agreement on the role of government on both state and federal level, and an adherence to the United States constitution would erase most differences and give commentators much less to rave about. Without this sort of structure, however, it's difficult for the two main political parties to work together. When representatives adhere to party politics at the expense of the country at large (again, a matter of perspective and opinion), people lose faith in their leaders.

Just think about the controversies that rage today in America. Should we support Israel or the Palestinians? Should we give amnesty to illegal aliens? Should we regulate public schools from the federal level or let the states run education? Should we bail out troubled banks and other companies - often regulated by government to an extreme degree - or let them make it on their own? Should we limit free speech and freedom of religion or let people's consciences guide their actions?

American political commentary has lots to say about all of these topics. Depending on how much emotion you invest in the political scene, you may feel burned out or you may decide to get involved one way or another. Differences of opinion can be good, if they result in wise decisions. That's what we're all praying for.




About the Author:



No comments:

Post a Comment