The development of living things and the universe at large has been a center of conflict between religious people and scientists. Christians believe that God created everything in a six day period as denoted in Genesis within the bible. Scientists believe evolution took place. In this perspective, several arguments against evolution theories have been advanced to reject the general scientific view.
Living things come about after procreation between those of the opposite sexes. This is the basic beginning of life in the view of both biology and religion. Scientists believe that life began from matters of non living things which are highly contradictory. With no proof but just claims by word of mouth, it is not logical for non living matter to evolve into living things.
On the side of universe, they believe it formed on its own from deformed matter. The weight is thrown behind the force of gravity. The biblical version denotes otherwise where God spent six days to create everything and He rested on the seventh day. Just mere statements of unknown force called gravity are not sufficient enough to support these theories.
Such a view does not beat logic. For anything to be formed there has to be an outside intelligence to put everything in the best position as of today. Gravitational force is just a mere theory whose proof is not concrete to make it possible in formation of spherical planets and stars. Besides, if its existence has been since time in memorial, it should have diminished to lower levels as of today.
Changes occur from well organized matter to more deformed ones. These theories on the other hand state that the earth came about in the other way, matter being piled from disorganized manner to more organized ones. Such a scenario can only occur where there is intellect capacity to cause such organized formations. Without it, the others are mere speculations with no basis.
The aspect of alteration is another base for their theories. This one says that human beings mutated from animals of the baboon family with the passage of time. This is not possible since mutation leads to formation of new generic matter; something similar to the original body and not totally different in any way. As of such the conclusion of this is that it is not viable and as already mentioned in the previous paragraphs, nothing can move from disorderly to that of orderly manner.
The aspect of cell division is another theory these scientists have been using. This one they employ in formation of all animals and plants. Realistically, this is not possible since cell division creates a replica similar to and nothing more complex than the original cells. Besides, this process is very slow and takes ages to come up anything advanced.
All in all, arguments against evolution theories and those in support clearly point to an existence of a party of high intelligent nature which caused all these happenings to occur and give rise to man. In Christian view, it is God who did all these work. Everything in existence is a good source of opposition to all these. Creation took place under the influence of the most high.
Living things come about after procreation between those of the opposite sexes. This is the basic beginning of life in the view of both biology and religion. Scientists believe that life began from matters of non living things which are highly contradictory. With no proof but just claims by word of mouth, it is not logical for non living matter to evolve into living things.
On the side of universe, they believe it formed on its own from deformed matter. The weight is thrown behind the force of gravity. The biblical version denotes otherwise where God spent six days to create everything and He rested on the seventh day. Just mere statements of unknown force called gravity are not sufficient enough to support these theories.
Such a view does not beat logic. For anything to be formed there has to be an outside intelligence to put everything in the best position as of today. Gravitational force is just a mere theory whose proof is not concrete to make it possible in formation of spherical planets and stars. Besides, if its existence has been since time in memorial, it should have diminished to lower levels as of today.
Changes occur from well organized matter to more deformed ones. These theories on the other hand state that the earth came about in the other way, matter being piled from disorganized manner to more organized ones. Such a scenario can only occur where there is intellect capacity to cause such organized formations. Without it, the others are mere speculations with no basis.
The aspect of alteration is another base for their theories. This one says that human beings mutated from animals of the baboon family with the passage of time. This is not possible since mutation leads to formation of new generic matter; something similar to the original body and not totally different in any way. As of such the conclusion of this is that it is not viable and as already mentioned in the previous paragraphs, nothing can move from disorderly to that of orderly manner.
The aspect of cell division is another theory these scientists have been using. This one they employ in formation of all animals and plants. Realistically, this is not possible since cell division creates a replica similar to and nothing more complex than the original cells. Besides, this process is very slow and takes ages to come up anything advanced.
All in all, arguments against evolution theories and those in support clearly point to an existence of a party of high intelligent nature which caused all these happenings to occur and give rise to man. In Christian view, it is God who did all these work. Everything in existence is a good source of opposition to all these. Creation took place under the influence of the most high.
About the Author:
If you are looking for arguments against evolution, visit the web pages at daywithoutyesterday.net today. You can read and consider the discussion at http://daywithoutyesterday.net now.
No comments:
Post a Comment